Wow, spot on opinion, at Fox News of all places! I think this part is so significant:
“…this new strain of intolerance coming from the Democrats is not just bad for the Democrats chances of taking back Congress next fall – it is bad for the country’s moral health.
During the Trump presidency, Democrats have consistently found success when they offer a reasoned alternative to President Trump’s imprudent, impetuous style…
When Democrats attempt to emulate the bad behavior of President Trump, they end up alienating moderates and falling further behind.
For Democrats to be successful, they need to recall former first lady Michelle Obama’s advice of “when they go low, we go high,” focus on issues that the American people need solutions to, and be the party that brings much needed civility back to Washington.”
The above quote was from the 3/2/07 episode of Democracy Now, which is linked below. I plan to keep this post at the top of my blog, because the U.S. government has & is clearly waging wars of aggression. This is what the Nuremberg Tribunal had to say about wars of aggression,
For years I have collected information on technology, finance, politics & sometimes an overlap of these subjects. Unfortunately, hard drives sometimes crash & data gets lost. That’s why the primary purpose of this blog is to backup this information to a categorized archive of the information I find most important & relevant. Thereby making it harder to lose & easier to locate specific material. I hope that not only will it be a place for me to utilize, but for others also. Directly below is one of my first posts, which I am keeping at the top, as it is a very important thing to know & remember.
Definition of Usury at Dictionary.com: (noun, plural usuries.) 1. the lending or practice of lending money at an exorbitant interest. 2. an exorbitant amount or rate of interest, especially in excess of the legal rate. 3. Obsolete. interest paid for the use of money.
Note from the current definition, that saying interest-owed lending is usury is supposedly obsolete. That is because we have been doing it so long, that we are to believe there is no other way. But there is another way. It is the same way that central banks treat each other now, which is loaning to each other at 0% interest. In the past societies rightfully believed in interest-free lending for good of country and community. I would even go so far as to say that part of the demonizing of Islam today is from the international banking cartel, as many Muslims do not believe in a usury system and still lend without interest. Here is an excerpt from Wikipedia.com:
“Historically, some cultures (e.g., Christianity in much of Medieval Europe, and Islam in many parts of the world today) have regarded charging any interest for loans as sinful.
Some of the earliest known condemnations of usury come from the Vedic texts of India. Similar condemnations are found in religious texts from Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (the term is riba in Arabic and ribbit in Hebrew). At times, many nations from ancient China to ancient Greece to ancient Rome have outlawed loans with any interest. Though the Roman Empire eventually allowed loans with carefully restricted interest rates, the Christian church in medieval Europe banned the charging of interest at any rate (as well as charging a fee for the use of money, such as at a bureau de change).”
This is one of those occasions when I agree with Trump. I’ve felt from the beginning this was neoMcCarthyism, though I don’t think it has done quite as much damage & hopefully won’t.
Knowing that one of the biggest neoconservative chicken hawks was/is involved in this & is backed by Democrats, says a lot about what is wrong with the party.
Sad but probably true analysis. Except he forgot to mention that Mueller does have a voice & it is much of the MSM.
This guy has to do some mental contortions to justify parts of this controversial law.
Source: Everything You’ve Heard About Israel’s Nation State Bill Is Wrong – The Forward
Here is the article linked to in my previous post below. Something not mentioned is whether out of desperation, Assange would reveal the source of the DNC/Podesta emails. If he did & it wasn’t anyone connected to Russia, that would be a major boon for Trump.
Of course it does. Though it was 95%+ accurate, it doesn’t stop Schiff-less from saying the memo, “…misrepresented and distorted these applications”. But Gowdy spoke the truth again, “I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,”