Just a little disclaimer to those who stumble upon my blog but don’t know me personally. I like to think that I am politically moderate, with a slight lean to the left. But this blog can give the impression that I am conservative. I believe this is because I call out the news media for what is perceived as political bias.
I feel true conservatives wrongly believe the media is liberally biased. What I see is a media with an agenda, that goes beyond increasing ratings & viewership. It is a hidden agenda that also wishes to shape public opinion. That agenda is neither left nor right, but of self interest & self enrichment. Ultimately elitist, if you will. If it were true liberal bias, one should see more reporting on the trials & tribulations of the average citizen (to give credit, there still is some true liberal reporting in the public news sector). Therefore, my focus is on untwisting the imbalance I perceive, which I will attest can come across as appearing conservative.
In the end, if the news is to truly serve the common good, it should aim to stay as neutral as possible & focus on the issues that most strongly impact our lives & society as a whole.
Wow, spot on opinion, at Fox News of all places! I think this part is so significant:
“…this new strain of intolerance coming from the Democrats is not just bad for the Democrats chances of taking back Congress next fall – it is bad for the country’s moral health.
During the Trump presidency, Democrats have consistently found success when they offer a reasoned alternative to President Trump’s imprudent, impetuous style…
When Democrats attempt to emulate the bad behavior of President Trump, they end up alienating moderates and falling further behind.
For Democrats to be successful, they need to recall former first lady Michelle Obama’s advice of “when they go low, we go high,” focus on issues that the American people need solutions to, and be the party that brings much needed civility back to Washington.”
The above quote was from the 3/2/07 episode of Democracy Now, which is linked below. I plan to keep this post at the top of my blog, because the U.S. government has & is clearly waging wars of aggression. This is what the Nuremberg Tribunal had to say about wars of aggression,
For years I have collected information on technology, finance, politics & sometimes an overlap of these subjects. Unfortunately, hard drives sometimes crash & data gets lost. That’s why the primary purpose of this blog is to backup this information to a categorized archive of the information I find most important & relevant. Thereby making it harder to lose & easier to locate specific material. I hope that not only will it be a place for me to utilize, but for others also. Directly below is one of my first posts, which I am keeping at the top, as it is a very important thing to know & remember.
Definition of Usury at Dictionary.com: (noun, plural usuries.) 1. the lending or practice of lending money at an exorbitant interest. 2. an exorbitant amount or rate of interest, especially in excess of the legal rate. 3. Obsolete. interest paid for the use of money.
Note from the current definition, that saying interest-owed lending is usury is supposedly obsolete. That is because we have been doing it so long, that we are to believe there is no other way. But there is another way. It is the same way that central banks treat each other now, which is loaning to each other at 0% interest. In the past societies rightfully believed in interest-free lending for good of country and community. I would even go so far as to say that part of the demonizing of Islam today is from the international banking cartel, as many Muslims do not believe in a usury system and still lend without interest. Here is an excerpt from Wikipedia.com:
“Historically, some cultures (e.g., Christianity in much of Medieval Europe, and Islam in many parts of the world today) have regarded charging any interest for loans as sinful.
Some of the earliest known condemnations of usury come from the Vedic texts of India. Similar condemnations are found in religious texts from Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (the term is riba in Arabic and ribbit in Hebrew). At times, many nations from ancient China to ancient Greece to ancient Rome have outlawed loans with any interest. Though the Roman Empire eventually allowed loans with carefully restricted interest rates, the Christian church in medieval Europe banned the charging of interest at any rate (as well as charging a fee for the use of money, such as at a bureau de change).”
Repubs will have to hurry, otherwise it will all get buried under a Dem flurry of new investigations.
And if this doesn’t scare you as much as Trump does, then you’re not paying attention.
I’m less concerned about the politics as usual that will continue, than I am with Congress running cover for the IC, because of what Schiff called “a breach of our compact with the intelligence community.”
I’d have to agree that Trump has fueled racists, some of whom are antisemites. But he has also fueled continued aggression by Israel, with his blind support for them. Sorry, can’t call that last part antisemitism.
Maybe all is quiet because he hasn’t found anything. I don’t expect the MSM to give it attention, but possibly more will come from conservative circles after the Mueller probe wraps up.